Visual Regression Testing Best Practices

    In the dynamic software development landscape, where periodic upgrades and evolutions are the norm, sustaining visual steadiness across different browser environments and devices is an intimidating problem. Visual regression testing presents a dependable mechanism to spot unintended visible deviations between distinct software application versions. 

    Hence, this article elaborates on the best strategies in regression testing, delving into tools, techniques, and methodologies that authorize development teams to recognize visual anomalies early in the development lifecycle. By acquiring these practices, enterprises can improve the quality of their virtual products, simplify the development procedure, and eventually deliver a seamless and visually appealing consumer experience.

    Select The Right Tool

    Selecting the accurate tool for visual regression testing is crucial to make testing your project hassle-free. The best tool should fit the requirements and limits of your project. First, ensure the tool is easy to use, as a hard-to-learn tool can decelerate things and might need unique training, which may not be possible for each project. 

    Next, test if the tool can steadily work with your actual development and testing tools like version control systems, CI/CD pipelines, and project management tools. It enables a seamless workflow and enhances productivity. It’s also crucial that the tool has good reporting attributes, giving concise observation into visual differences and handling quick responses with proclamation. Automating tests is essential for ascending operations and getting goods to market faster. Automation testing saves time and diminishes errors, making them a critical part of any visual regression testing tool.

    LambdaTest is an AI-powered test orchestration and execution platform that sets a new standard for Regression Testing. With access to over 3,000+ real browsers and devices, LambdaTest ensures comprehensive test coverage for your applications. Its seamless integration with CI/CD tools and error-tracking systems streamlines the testing process, guaranteeing precision and efficiency in every testing cycle.

    One standout feature of LambdaTest is its automated screenshot comparison capability, which goes beyond conventional testing tools by detecting even the most subtle differences at the pixel level. This saves valuable time and delivers highly accurate results, ensuring no detail goes unnoticed.

    Moreover, LambdaTest’s cloud-based testing infrastructure is scalable and supports parallel testing, significantly accelerating project completion. This means you can execute multiple tests concurrently, making your testing process faster and more efficient than ever before.

    Real-time interactive testing is another game-changer offered by LambdaTest. It fosters collaboration among testers by allowing them to interact with applications on various browsers and devices in real time. This not only expedites error resolution but also enhances teamwork, making LambdaTest an ideal choice for teams of all sizes.

    To summarize, LambdaTest is a must-try solution for Regression Testing. Its AI-powered capabilities, extensive device and browser coverage, automated screenshot comparison, scalability, and real-time interactive testing make it a top-tier choice for any testing project. 

    Create A Robust Baseline 

    Creating a solid foundation is exceptionally vital in visual regression testing. It’s like forming a robust base for correct and efficient testing. This procedure includes designing a set of reference pictures that correctly denotes how your web application should look at a particular time, whether at the initiation of development or after a significant design change. A reliable baseline is crucial because it is a trustworthy reference point. These reference images show exactly how your application should appear and function under normal conditions. They cover the layout, design, and visual aspects of essential pages and sections in your application.

    Use Semantic Versioning

    Utilizing semantic versioning as a means to archive and label baseline images presents an organized and meaningful approach to monitoring alterations over time. Typically, this versioning system consists of three components, each separated by periods (e.g., 1.2.3). Major version adjustments may signify substantial redesigns or rebranding efforts; minor versions might include new features affecting certain visual aspects, and patch versions could involve minor adjustments or bug fixes.

    Adopting a semantic framework simplifies the comprehension of the visual transformation history with a cursory glance. In instances where disparities are uncovered during testing, the version number swiftly conveys insights into the nature and scope of the modifications, expediting the debugging process. Additionally, semantic versioning streamlines the process of reverting to earlier iterations, whether for testing purposes or returning to a stable state in case of issues. In short, identifying the specific set of baseline images linked to a particular application version becomes effortless, enhancing precision and reducing the potential for errors in the rollback process.

    Practical Test Methods

    Automation testing, especially when checking for how things look in different versions, works better when you use the same steps repeatedly. Think of these steps as building blocks that fit together easily. You make these steps once and then use them for many different tests without changing them much. This practical testing method makes testing quicker and easier to handle. These test steps encompass typical activities within a web application, such as navigating to specific pages, interacting with user interface components, or capturing screenshots at critical stages of the program’s execution. The primary advantages of reusable test steps are increased efficiency and consistency. Testers can assemble these systematized attributes into a library readily available and utilized in new test cases and scenarios. This approach reduces the replication of effort and enhances the procedure of test creation. Furthermore, it enables testing to regulate to a constant methodology, as similar test processes are applied across distinct tests.

    Review And Update Baselines Regularly

    The ever-changing nature of software development indicates that visual designs are concerned with evolution over time due to upgrades in characteristics, redesigns, or other modifications. In this scenario, the baseline pictures utilized in visual regression testing are not placed in stone; they require frequent inspection and arrangement to remain relevant and efficient. Outdated baseline pictures can lead to wrong positives, where tests erroneously recognize similarities that are intended modifications. It can result in the devastation of time and resources in finding non-issues. On the contrary, they may also lead to wrong negatives, where actual problems go overlooked because they stay within an outdated baseline. To reduce these possibilities, it is crucial to launch a routine for reviewing and upgrading baseline images. This procedure can be triggered by specific events, such as the release of the latest attribute or a significant design upgrade, or it can be scheduled as part of periodic maintenance.

    Comprehensive And Customized Reporting

    Automated visual regression testing requires thorough and adjustable reporting capabilities. It includes generating flexible, extensive reports that offer intuitive data regarding the testing procedure, thereby smoothening the understanding, assessment, and reaction to the outcomes for development teams. A thorough report should include all relevant information aligning the test runs. It contains specific information such as images, videos, issue reports, details regarding the testing environment, and pass/fail outcomes. These reports offer a comprehensive view of the testing procedure, enabling the identification of precise types of visual discrepancies and facilitating their swift resolution.

    Scalability in reporting allows for tailoring the level of detail to meet the audience’s specific requirements. For example, project managers may prefer high-level summaries, whereas QA analysts might require in-depth reports laden with technical specifics. Scalable reporting accommodates varying levels of detail, enabling stakeholders to access the data most pertinent to their respective roles.

    Scriptless Automation And Reusable Code Objects

    The software testing method known as “scriptless automation” defines a way to diminish the need for designing complicated code scripts to run test cases. Scriptless automation tools furnish a consumer-centric platform that permits testers to create and run test cases using a graphical or digital platform rather than manually coding each step of the test. This approach smoothened the testing procedure, making it attainable even to persons without considerable programming skills.

    One significant benefit of scriptless automation is that it reduces the hurdle to entry for test automation. Testers can aim to describe test scenarios, actions, and possible results without getting intertwined in the complexities of coding. This method accelerates the designing and support of tests, as adaptation can be quickly implemented using the tool’s consumer-centric platform. Scriptless automation is further handled by reusable code objects, which offer pre-defined, reusable elements or functions that can be easily combined into test cases. These code objects denote different consumer interactions or actions, such as form submissions, button clicks, and checks on-page elements.

    Be Selective In What You Test

    While operating comprehensive testing is crucial to guarantee a top-notch consumer experience, it is neither reliable nor important to subject every page and element in your application to visual regression testing. The number of possible tests can become immense and time-intensive, and not all pages or features hold equal importance. A more strategic approach would involve giving precedence to critical user journeys and pivotal pages for testing. These segments of your application are utilized most frequently or wield the most significant influence on user experience and business performance metrics. Therefore, exercising selectivity in your testing process allows for a more concentrated and pragmatic application of visual regression testing.

    Run Tests In Parallel

    Conducting tests concurrently proves to be an exceedingly efficient approach for expediting the visual regression testing process, particularly in the case of larger projects comprising a multitude of test cases. The traditional sequential testing approach can be time-intensive since each test case must be finalized before the subsequent one commences. Nonetheless, many contemporary visual regression testing tools offer the capability for parallel execution, enabling multiple test cases to run concurrently. It leads to a substantial reduction in the overall time necessary to complete the testing phase.

    For instance, consider a scenario where you have ten test cases, each requiring one minute for sequential execution. In this scenario, you would need at least ten minutes for complete execution. In contrast, when these tests are executed in parallel, the total time may be reduced to the duration of the lengthiest individual test, contingent upon sufficient computational resources.

    Continuous Integration (CI) 

    Incorporating Continuous Integration (CI) is a pivotal strategy within the realm of automated testing, particularly in the context of visual regression testing. Continuous integration is a method that’s meant to catch problems early in the development process. It runs tests automatically whenever new code changes are added to a central place where all the code is kept. This process exemplifies how every CI iteration swiftly and accurately validates the visual consistency of the application. This linkage offers two undeniable advantages. First, when visual discrepancies and regressions are identified, developers can rectify these issues promptly, and second, these bugs can be fixed without the need for extensive time, financial resources, or labor-intensive bug patching efforts.


    It’s important to remember that visual regression testing is a continuous endeavor that demands cooperation, meticulousness, and the appropriate tools. In a landscape where technology and design trends are in constant flux, adhering to these best practices is crucial for preserving your applications’ visual consistency and functionality across diverse platforms, web browsers, and devices. Therefore, embrace the potential of visual regression testing and lay the groundwork for delivering more refined and user-friendly software experiences.

    Recent Articles


    Related Stories

    Leave A Reply

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Stay on op - Ge the daily news in your inbox